AI findings
What a review point is, why it exists, and what approve, adjust and ignore each do.
A review point is a judgement the build made that a human should see. It arrives with its reasoning attached, and with the document that prompted it.
Each one carries a priority, the schedule it belongs to, and the reasoning behind it — including what evidence was and was not sighted.
Answering them
| Action | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Reply | You write the answer. It is recorded against the point and used when the figures are reworked. |
| Ignore | Not relevant to this case. It stops being raised. |
| Update working paper | Reworks the affected figures with every answer given so far. |
| Ignore rest | Clears the remainder in one go, when none of them apply. |
Nothing is a silent default. The panel keeps a running count — answered · ignored · untouched — and a point left untouched stays outstanding rather than being treated as agreed.
What gets flagged, and what does not
A review point is raised for a missing document implied by the prior year, or for a treatment the build was not certain about. It is not raised because a number moved a lot year on year.
That is deliberate. Variance is not evidence of error — a client who bought a vehicle has a large, correct variance — and a system that flags size produces a queue nobody reads.
The prefill is authoritative
Where the ATO pre-filling report and a client-supplied document disagree on income, the prefill wins and the disagreement becomes a review point rather than a silent choice.